Home » Technology » Congress just gave DHS another $70 billion

Share This Post

Technology

Congress just gave DHS another $70 billion

Congress just gave DHS another $70 billion

The funding bill will supercharge Trump’s mass deportation agenda for the next three years.

The funding bill will supercharge Trump’s mass deportation agenda for the next three years.

VRG_Illo_K_Radtke_STK006_DHS_1
VRG_Illo_K_Radtke_STK006_DHS_1
Gaby Del Valle
is a policy reporter at The Verge covering surveillance, the Department of Homeland Security, and the tech-right.

Congress narrowly voted to fund President Donald Trump’s mass deportation agenda, giving the Department of Homeland Security $70 billion over the next three years.

The house voted 214 to 212 in favor of the reconciliation bill Tuesday, following the Senate’s 52-47 vote last Friday morning. The vote fell largely along party lines. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) was the only Senate Republican to vote against it. Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI), initially voted against the bill — meaning it would have failed — but changed his vote after huddling with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) and and Appropriations Chair Tom Cole, according to The Hill. No Democrats voted in favor of the funding bill, which was done through a budget reconciliation process to avoid a Democratic filibuster.

Democrats tried to use the legislation to block Trump’s $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization fund,” which would compensate people who claim they were victimized by the federal government — and which critics say is a slush fund for Trump’s allies. (The Department of Justice said it would stop work on the fund after a federal judge in Virginia temporarily blocked it from making any payouts, but Trump has continued to express interest in the idea.) They also tried to get Republicans to agree to a number of reforms for ICE and Customs and Border Protection in the wake of the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti. Neither appear in the final bill.

In a speech on the House floor ahead of the Tuesday vote, Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-PA) criticized Republicans for using the budget reconciliation process to avoid negotiating with Democrats, and emphasized ICE’s lack of popularity with the American people.

“At its core, this Republican reconciliation budget bill is a statement about priorities, and the priorities represented in this budget bill could not be more out of step with the needs and values of the American people,” Scanlon said.

Scanlon noted that DHS has yet to spend $100 billion of the nearly $200 billion it received under Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act. She added that Trump has not only expanded ICE’s reach by increasingly going after legal immigrants but also weaponized DHS against its critics. The bill, she said, will “supercharge” Trump’s abuses.

After the House markup last Friday, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), ranking member of the House Appropriations Committee, noted that the bill not only lacks sufficient reforms but also cuts funding for cybersecurity and TSA, whose workers went weeks without pay during the DHS shutdown.

The funding bill comes at a time of deep unpopularity for ICE. One recent poll found that just 33 percent of voters approve of how the agency is doing its job.

And it comes amid yet another threat from border czar Tom Homan to flood New York City with ICE agents. In an interview with Fox News on Monday, Homan said he would send “more ICE agents than you’ve ever seen” to New York City if the state government passed a bill limiting cooperation with DHS.

“Providing a quarter trillion dollars to an administration promising that the public ‘ain’t seen shit yet’ when it comes to mass deportation is a historic mistake,” Todd Schulte, president of the immigration reform group FWD.us, said in a statement. “Supercharging the funding for these already out of control systems will come with terrible human consequences and continue to be met with increasing opposition from voters.”

Correction, June 9th: A previous version of this story said Rep. Tim Walberg voted against the funding bill. He initially voted against it but then changed his vote to support it.

Update, June 9th: This story has been updated to include comment from FWD.us president Todd Schulte.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Most Popular

Share This Post

Leave a Reply